A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Tuesday dismissed the objection raised by the National Judicial Council (NJC) against the hearing of a suit instituted by a dismissed Judge, Rita Ofili Ajumogobia, to challenge her dismissal.
wowplus NJC had in 2018 dismissed Justice Ajumogobia as a Judge of the Federal High Court from the service of the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) on grounds of alleged gross judicial misconduct.
Following her dismissal, Justice Ajumogobia who wasn’t satisfied with the NJC’s action, instituted an action at the Federal High Court, Abuja challenging the process adopted by the fact-finding committee of the NJC which led to her dismissal.
The embattled Judge prayed the court to declare as illegal, unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void the fact-finding committee’s reported that recommended her dismissal.
Among others, the dismissed Judge claimed that her fundamental right to a fair hearing was breached in the ways and manners she was dismissed from the court bench.
However, the NJC and other defendant’s in the matter filed separate preliminary objections against the hearing of the suit on the ground that the Federal High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain such a matter.
The NJC contended that being a labour related matter involving an employment the plaintiff ought to have gone to the National Industrial Court to ventilate her grievances. While denying the claim of the denial of fair hearing by the judge, the defendants further contended that the case was statute-barred, having not been instituted within three months as required by the Public Officers Protection Act.
Also, Justice Ajumogobia, in her counter-affidavit, had prayed Justice Inyang Ekwo to dismiss the objection to her suit on the ground that she was challenging the constitutionality of her dismissal.
In his ruling, Justice Ekwo dismissed all the objections on the ground that they were misplaced and that the plaintiff’s claim was misconstrued.
Ekwo held that Justice Ajumogobia raised constitutional issues bordering on denial of a fair hearing in the manner she was dismissed.
“The case of the plaintiff did not fall under the provision of the Public Officers Protection Act as claimed by the NJC and as such, was not statute bar.
“Moreover, the plaintiff’s claim being a constitutional matter can only be heard by a Federal High Court and not a National Industrial Court as canvassed by the NJC,” the Justice said.
The Judge fixed April 5,6, and 7 for the hearing of the substantive matter.
—
