Home Communities Politics Fox News’ Andrew Napolitano Calls Evidence Of Impeachable Actions ‘Overwhelming’
Politics

Fox News’ Andrew Napolitano Calls Evidence Of Impeachable Actions ‘Overwhelming’

Share
fox news andrew napolitano calls evidence of impeachable actions overwhelming 2
Share
fox news andrew napolitano calls evidence of impeachable actions overwhelming 1
Fox News’ Andrew Napolitano Calls Evidence Of Impeachable Actions ‘Overwhelming’
Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano on Friday called the evidence of impeachable behavior by Donald Trump presented at the House hearings “overwhelming” — and enough to justify three or four articles of impeachment against the president.

Despite that, Napolitano said he “can’t imagine [Trump] will be removed from office” by the Republican-controlled Senate after a trial.

“The evidence of his impeachable behavior at this point, in my view, is overwhelming,” he said in an interview on the libertarian Reason TV. Napolitano also noted that Trump “hasn’t presented a defense, and I don’t know if he plans to.”

Top of Napolitano’s list of articles of impeachment that he expects the Democrats to bring is bribery, referring to Trump’s withholding of nearly $400 million in U.S. military aid as he pressed Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky in a July phone call to launch an investigation into his political rival Joe Biden and Biden’s son.

The Democrats will “argue that the president’s failure to disperse funds that the Congress ordered be dispersed until the recipient of the funds agreed to investigate a potential political opponent is an act of bribery,” Napolitano explained. “That is enough … to make it over the threshold of impeachable offenses. I don’t think it’s enough to convict of bribery, but it’s enough to allege it.”

The second charge will likely be “high crimes and misdemeanors — election law violation,” Napolitano noted. The third crime will be “obstruction of justice,” while the fourth could be “interference with a witness,” he said.

A fifth may be “lying under oath,” noted Napolitano. That would stem from Trump’s alleged lie under oath to special counsel Robert Mueller when he said he didn’t recall discussing WikiLeaks and hacked Democratic Party emails with Roger Stone. That contradicts testimony at Stone’s trial, in which Trump’s longtime friend and informer adviser was convicted of all seven charges levied against him, including lying to Congress and witness intimidation.

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Related Articles
Justin Trudeau's Ex Sophie Posts Cryptic Message After His Saucy Katy Perry Yacht Trip
Celebrity newsPolitics

Sophie Trudeau’s Quiet Post: About Letting Go, Love, and What Comes Next

After a photo of Justin Trudeau and Katy Perry's PDA circulated the...

Karoline Leavitt Wore Some Seriously Bad Outfits In 2025
Celebrity newsPolitics

When Fashion Fails: A Look Back at Karoline Leavitt’s 2025 Wardrobe Woes

From clunky blazers to ill-fitting skirts, Karoline Leavitt's 2025 style screamed more...

Kristi Noem's Rumored Lover Corey Lewandowski Signals He's Tired Of Being In Her Shadow
United States NewsPolitics

Corey Lewandowski’s Next Move — Or Maybe Not: A Closer Look

Corey Lewandowski may have his eye on a new role, but the...

Side By Side Pics Of JD Vance's Transformation Are Head Turning (But The Eyeliner Was Always There)
PoliticsUnited States News

From Kid in a Yearbook to the White House: JD Vance’s Surprising Face Change

JD Vance looked a whole lot different back in 2017, when he...