WowPlus
Home Relationships Scandals Man wins the ‘legal right to be boring at work’ after his employer fired him for not going out or hanging out with colleagues enough
Scandals

Man wins the ‘legal right to be boring at work’ after his employer fired him for not going out or hanging out with colleagues enough

Share
Share

h

man wins the legal right to be boringa ata work after his employer fired him for not going out or hanging out with colleagues enough

A Frenchman has won the legal right to be boring at work, after a court in Paris ruled his employer was wrong to fire him for not going out or hanging out with colleagues enough.

Cubik Partners, a management consultancy, says it uses a ‘fun’ approach to its team-building and encourage staff to go out to the pub after work. But Mr. T, whose real name was not disclosed, didn’t want to take part in the team-building exercises.

According to him, he was entitled to ‘critical behaviour and to refuse company policy based on incitement to partake in various excesses’.

The company decided to fire him in 2015 for ‘professional inadequacy’, accusing the employee of being boring, according to The Daily Telegraph.

Cubik Partners also argued that Mr. T was a poor listener and difficult to work with.

But in a ruling made last week and revealed Thursday, Paris’ Court of Cassation decided the man had a right to refuse to party — ordering Cubik Partners to pay out £2,574 to the former employee.

The company wasn’t allowed to make him ‘forcibly participate in seminars and end-of-week drinks frequently ending up in excessive alcohol intake, encouraged by associates who made very large quantities of alcohol available’, the court said.

He had a fundamental right to dignity and respect of private life, said the court, adding that the employee was expressing his freedom of expression by not taking part.

The court went further, adding that the company engaged in ‘humiliating and intrusive practices regarding privacy such as simulated sexual acts, the obligation to share a bed with a colleague during seminars, the use of nicknames to designate people and hanging up deformed and made-up photos in offices’.

Mr T has demanded another £395,630 in damages, which the court is set to examine in a follow-up hearing.

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
Why Diane Keaton Was 'Humiliated' By Her Kissing Scenes With Jack Nicholson
ScandalsTrending

Diane Keaton Kissing Scenes With Jack Nicholson Left Her Feeling “Humiliated”

Diane Keaton and Jack Nicholson had great chemistry on the set of...

11 Celebrities Who Are Rumored To Be Horrible Neighbors
ScandalsTrending

11 Celebrities Who Are Rumored To Be Horrible Neighbors

From Kanye West to Ellen DeGeneres, these celebrities have left neighbors with...

Taylor Swift's Wedding Gives Billionaire Michael Rubin A Major Ego Check
Scandals

Taylor Swift Wedding Rumors Put Michael Rubin’s White Party In An Awkward Spotlight

Michael Rubin hosts a star-studded Fourth of July party every year, but...

Meet Stanley Tucci's 5 Kids And Their Mothers
ScandalsTrending

Stanley Tucci Kids: Inside The Actor’s Family Life, Loss, And Second Chance At Love

From the three children Stanley Tucci shared with his late wife, Kate,...