Home Communities Politics Trump recycles discredited Islamic pigs’ blood tale after terrorist attack in Barcelona
Politics

Trump recycles discredited Islamic pigs’ blood tale after terrorist attack in Barcelona

Share
trump recycles discredited islamic pigs blood tale after terrorist attack in barcelona
Share
As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump defended his stance on waterboarding in Charleston, S.C., in February 2016, with a largely discredited story from the internet about killing terrorists with bullets dipped in pigs’ blood. (AP)

Hours after an apparent terrorist attack in Barcelona, President Trump on Thursday recycled a largely discredited Internet tale that he promoted on the campaign trail as a way to call attention to what he has called “radical Islamic terrorism.”

In a Twitter message, Trump instructed his 36 million followers to look to the example of  Gen. John J. Pershing, who is said, in stories circulating online, to have dipped bullets in pigs’ blood to execute Islamic terrorists in the Philippines whose religion forbid contact with the animals.

The story has been found to be unsubstantiated by numerous fact-checkers in the media. But Trump first told the story during a campaign rally in February 2016, as he defended his position of supporting methods of torture, such as waterboarding, on terrorist suspects.

Trump’s tweet came hours after a man in Barcelona drove a van at high speeds into a crowd at a popular tourist destination, killing 12 and injuring 50 more, according to local police who are calling the attack an act of terrorism. One man is reportedly in custody in the investigation.

Trump also tweeted message of support for the victims, in which he said the United States “condemns the terror attack.”

The message stood in sharp contrast to Trump’s reaction Saturday to an attack in Charlottesville, when a man drove a car into a group of people protesting a white nationalist rally, killing a woman and injuring 19 others. An alleged Nazi sympathizer who had attended the rally is charged with second-degree murder in the case.

After than incident, Trump blamed the actions of people “on many sides” of the violent clashes.

President Trump on Aug. 15 said that “there’s blame on both sides” for the violence that erupted in Charlottesville on Aug. 12. (Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)

Though he denounced the white supremacist hate groups directly two days later, Trump then reversed course and again blamed “both sides” on Tuesday, prompting a widespread political backlash. The president on Tuesday explained that his initial reaction had been muted because he did not have all the “facts” in the case and wanted to be cautious.

In his February recitation of the Pershing story, Trump told a crowd of supporters that the general was having trouble dealing with terrorist attacks and caught 50 suspects.

“He took the 50 terrorists, and he took 50 men and he dipped 50 bullets in pigs’ blood — you heard that, right? He took 50 bullets, and he dipped them in pigs’ blood,” Trump continued. “And he had his men load his rifles, and he lined up the 50 people, and they shot 49 of those people. And the 50th person, he said: You go back to your people, and you tell them what happened. And for 25 years, there wasn’t a problem. Okay? Twenty-five years, there wasn’t a problem.”

At one point in telling this story, Trump said: “By the way, this is something you can read in the history books — not a lot of history books because they don’t like teaching this.”

Although Trump never used the word “Muslim” in this story, he was clearly referring to Muslim terrorists and at one point commented: “There’s a whole thing with swine and animals and pigs, and — you know the story, you know they don’t like that.” Pigs are deemed impure by the Koran.

There are several versions of the tale circulating, including one in which the prisoners were buried with dead pigs. The pigs’ blood on the bullets, according to at least one version, would keep a Muslim from entering heaven.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations denounced Trump’s remarks last year in a sharply worded statement that accused the then-candidate of inciting anti-Muslim attacks.

Jenna Johnson contributed to this report.

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Related Articles
Judge Jeanine Pirro Looked So Different Before All The Plastic Surgery
Celebrity newsPolitics

The Changing Face of Judge Jeanine Pirro: Then and Now

The passage of time and Judge Jeanine Pirro's heavy MAGA makeup probably...

The Absolute Worst-Dressed Attendees At Lauren Sanchez & Jeff Bezos' Wedding
PoliticsUnited States News

Worst Dressed at Lauren Sanchez & Jeff Bezos’ Wedding

It was a competition to see whether any guest could dress worse...

Paris Hilton's Shady Take On Trump's Notorious Tan Was Right On Target
PoliticsUnited States News

Paris Hilton’s Snarky Take on Trump’s Orange Glow Hits the Mark

Paris Hilton once claimed that she voted for Donald Trump, but she...

Melania's Response To Donald's Alleged Affairs? A Masterclass In Indifference
United States NewsPolitics

The Quiet Strength of Melania Trump: Navigating Scandal with Grace and Silence

Donald Trump and alleged affairs are certainly nothing new, but if they've...