Shifts at the network, a few missteps and a social media that never forgets — that’s the short version of what’s happened to Gayle King’s public image over the past several years. Nothing fell apart overnight; reputations rarely do. Instead, a string of incidents, each small on its own, have layered together in a way that makes her comeback feel tougher than it might otherwise be. I don’t think she’s finished — not at all — but the easy goodwill she once enjoyed is definitely frayed.
A changing role and uncertain future
King’s contract situation has been a recurring subplot. Reports about changes at CBS and talk that her $15 million deal was nearing its end sparked plenty of speculation: would she stay? Leave? Move away from the morning desk she’s been closely associated with? Sources later suggested there was an agreement in place and that CBS wanted to keep her. King herself has said she wants to stay. Still, a spokesperson’s assurance that “we expect [King] to have a very long future here” doesn’t erase the fact that rumors about reassignment have circulated. That uncertainty alone opens space for people to scrutinize everything she does — and that’s precisely what happened.
Also read: My Mom Wanted Me with Rihanna — A$AP Rocky’s Story, Sort Of
The Blue Origin trip: historic but tone-deaf
In April 2025, King flew on a Blue Origin mission alongside other well-known women. It was historic in a narrow sense: an all-female multi-person flight made headlines. King’s own excitement was obvious — she posted about “just got back from space” and the whole thing looked, on the surface, celebratory.
But the public reaction was mixed, to put it mildly. The flight became a lightning rod because of cost and optics: space tourism is still associated with extreme wealth, and many people felt the project was disconnected from everyday struggles. Commenters accused participants of being out of touch, or of turning a highly unequal opportunity into an image of feminist progress. King pushed back, defending the mission and praising efforts to tackle environmental problems. She argued that people criticizing didn’t understand the science or the intent. Fair enough — though the defensive tone didn’t help. To many, it came across as missing the point: saying, “You don’t get it,” rarely calms a crowd already uneasy about privilege.
A business-class gripe that looked small but landed big
Here’s another example of how small moments stack up. In early 2025, King posted (then deleted) a short video complaining that a purchased “window” seat in business class had no window. On technical grounds she may have had a point; the airline was facing similar complaints. But public reaction skewed unsympathetic. The complaint landed as tone-deaf amidst rising living costs and a general sense that many people are simply trying to afford travel, food, rent. People noticed the contrast: someone publicly lamenting the absence of a window while many struggle with far larger problems. Some defended her right to be annoyed, while others said: sure, raise this quietly with the airline — don’t make it content for the rest of us. She deleted the post, which suggests she felt the backlash.
Also read: The Other Side of Hilary Farr:
The Oprah connection: blessing, burden, and persistent skepticism
Gayle King’s friendship with Oprah Winfrey is long-standing and real; it goes back decades. That association brought King doors and visibility, and it’s naive to suggest any of that was irrelevant. But at the same time, people have repeatedly used the relationship to explain away King’s achievements, implying she wouldn’t have reached her position without Oprah. That narrative is unfair in some ways — it downplays King’s own work — but it’s also durable. Whenever controversy hits King, critics trot out the “Oprah did it for her” line, as if that explains every success or shields her from critique.
King rejects the “shadow” idea and says she stands in Winfrey’s light. Still, public perception is sticky: once an angle takes hold, it keeps resurfacing. It’s partly about power dynamics and partly about how much Americans love simple explanations. I admit — I’ve wondered, sometimes — whether that narrative sticks because it’s comfortable to tell. Maybe that’s human.
The Kobe Bryant interview: a mistake that lingered
Perhaps the most lasting stain on King’s reputation came early in 2020, right after Kobe Bryant’s sudden death. During an interview, she asked about the old sexual-assault allegations and whether they affected his legacy. The timing was, to many viewers, jarring and insensitive. The clip CBS released — a short, out-of-context snippet — made things worse. People reacted angrily, and celebrities and fans weighed in. King apologized, saying editors’ choices were partly to blame and that she regretted how viewers saw the clip. Still, that moment kept resurfacing years later when she faced unrelated criticism. It’s a reminder that certain mistakes don’t just hit hard once; they echo.
Small missteps, compounded effect
What’s clear is this: none of these episodes, taken alone, would necessarily sink a well-known journalist’s career. Celebrities and media figures make missteps all the time and bounce back. But when a series of misjudgments — or perceived misjudgments — happens over time, they begin to form a pattern in the public’s mind. That’s what’s happened with King. Space trip? Tone-deaf, said many. Plane gripe? Out of touch, said others. Oprah tie? Seen as nepotism by some. Kobe question? Remembered as insensitive. Together, they reduce the reservoir of goodwill she can draw on.
Also read: My Mom Wanted Me with Rihanna — A$AP Rocky’s Story, Sort Of
She’s human, but that isn’t always the public’s bottom line
I don’t want to dismiss how hard this all has been for her. High-profile careers come with relentless scrutiny, and not every misstep is evidence of bad character or incompetence. But from an audience perspective, repeated clashes with public sentiment create a credibility deficit. That’s a problem for a journalist whose work depends on trust and relatability.
So where does that leave her? She’s still employed, still vocal about wanting to stay, and clearly has defenders. Yet the road back to wide affection is narrower than it once was. Rebuilding will take time, a few humility-driven choices, and maybe a few quieter moments off social media. Or she’ll be reassigned to a role that suits the network’s needs and public appetite better. Either way, the era of unquestioned goodwill seems to have passed.
Leave a comment