There’s something oddly human about the way small rules trip up even the most polished public figures. Sophie Grégoire Trudeau’s visit with Pope Francis—warm, candid, and, yes, slightly awkward—felt like one of those moments. On the surface it was a diplomatic success: a meeting between a prominent Canadian figure and the head of the Catholic Church, full of smiles and a touch of light-hearted banter. But if fashion faux pas get remembered harder than carefully worded statements, then Sophie’s missing veil is the story people will retell.
To set the scene: Sophie posted afterward, calling the meeting “an enriching experience.” She described their chat with a kind of casual affection. She even shared a little anecdote about asking the Pope whether he had any vices. He responded with what Sophie described as “the wide, curious eyes of a child” and laughed when she joked about maple syrup. Then the tone switched: he asked her—quietly, earnestly—to “please pray for me.” That tiny pivot, from lightness to solemnity, is exactly the kind of human moment that stays with you. You could say it made the whole encounter feel intimate and real.
Also read: Norah O’Donnell: Photos That Surprise, But Don’t Define Her
But while the conversation seemed to go well, online commentary latched onto something else: Sophie’s choice of attire. She showed up in a simple black dress—modest, unadorned, plain enough that it would meet most people’s expectations for respectful dress. And yet, when it comes to meeting the Pope, there are very specific traditions that many expect to be followed. Historically, women meeting the pontiff have adhered to a strict protocol: black dresses, often long, and a veil. Sophie got the color right but missed the veil. That absence became a bigger talking point than anyone likely intended.
Why the veil mattered to some observers There’s a sense—rightly or wrongly—that traditions like wearing a veil are about deference and respect for an institution that has long rituals. Some people see the veil as symbolic, part of a centuries-old visual language of humility in the presence of the Pope. Others see it simply as old-fashioned, or even exclusionary. The variance in reactions is predictable. Some praised Sophie’s simplicity; others criticized the omission, calling it a breach of protocol.
Compare Sophie’s look to those who came before her: Melania Trump and Ivanka Trump had visited around the same period and both wore black dresses with veils that covered at least some of their hair. Their outfits were discussed—of course they were—and not just for the garments themselves but for the messages people read into them. When public figures choose to follow or diverge from tradition, the meaning ascribed to those choices often has less to do with the clothes and more to do with politics, image, or perceived intent. In Sophie’s case, most commentary seemed to assume she simply didn’t wear the veil intentionally, or perhaps she didn’t feel it necessary. People filled the gap with their own interpretations.
A reminder: people mess up I find it oddly comforting—if that’s the right word—that a simple missing accessory can dominate the conversation. It reminds me that public life is not a flawless broadcast. Sophie’s conversation with the Pope—laughs, a confessional plea, a shared belief in peace across faiths—was human and unvarnished. The absent veil is more of a human slip than a scandal. She likely prepared for the meeting with intent and seriousness; something small was overlooked or deprioritized. Life is messy. Public life more so.
Also read: New Neighbors, Old Questions: How William and Kate’s Move Stirred the Street
There’s also the larger context: style as a statement. For public figures, clothing choices are read like sentences in a speech—sometimes meant to say something, sometimes misread. Sophie has been the subject of fashion commentary before. This time, her choice—or oversight—was framed as deviating from a protocol many expected her to follow. Some framed it as a slight to tradition. Others took a more forgiving view, seeing it as modernity nudging at old rules. I’m not sure which interpretation is “right.” Maybe both are, to varying degrees.
What this episode says about us This tiny moment reveals a lot about how we process public life. We can be quick to moralize fashion choices. We project intentions onto what might be the simplest of things: a missing veil, a different hemline, a deliberate color choice. The fact that a warm, apparently sincere exchange with the Pope became, for many, a story about an accessory, tells you where our attentions go—lust for symbolic meaning over the quieter, human details.
And yet, the meeting itself—sharing a laugh over maple syrup, hearing the Pope ask for prayers—those are the poignant details I keep thinking about. They’re the parts that feel genuine, if a bit messy. The wardrobe hiccup? It’s a humanizing footnote. In public life, perhaps those footnotes are what remind us people are behind polished images—people who forget a veil, who get nervous, who laugh, who ask for prayers.
I don’t think Sophie meant anything by skipping the veil, if she indeed skipped it on purpose at all. Maybe she simply wanted to focus on the conversation. Maybe the veil felt out of step with her own sense of how to meet a religious leader. Or maybe it was a small oversight—an honest human moment. However you read it, the episode will likely linger in public memory more for its trivia value than for any real meaning.
Wrap-up Sophie Grégoire Trudeau’s meeting with Pope Francis will be remembered for the warmth of the exchange, the surprising candor, and yes, the missed veil. People will keep debating what the lack of a veil signified—or didn’t. For my part, I find the human bits more interesting than the fashion judgment. The laughter over maple syrup, the Pope’s request for prayers—those stick. The outfit controversy? It’s a reminder that in public life, small slips become stories, while real human moments get buffeted around by speculation. It’s messy. It’s normal. And we’ll probably keep talking about the veil more than we’ll talk about the prayer request. Which, well… says something.
Leave a comment