For decades, young men overshadowed young women in the job market, boasting higher education levels and grabbing the better-paying entry level jobs with more opportunities for advancement. With more than half of younger women out of the labor force and raising families, the job market of 40 or 50 years ago was largely a man’s world.
But that reality quietly changed, and in recent years, millennial women have surged ahead of many of their male counterparts. Close to 60 percent of all college students are women, demonstrating a growing gender gap in higher education–the so-called “ticket” to a high-paying job. A recent U.S. Census Bureau analysis shows that as more young women obtained college degrees, delayed having children, and joined the workforce, they edged out millennial men for better-paying jobs.
Strikingly, more young men “are falling to the bottom of the income ladder,” as young women beat them out for jobs, the study concluded. Frequently, men have struggled to land even modest-paying blue collar jobs.
For example, in 1975 only 25 percent of men aged 25 to 34 had incomes of less than $30,000 per year, the data shows. Yet by 2016, the share of young men with incomes of less than $30,000 rose to 41 percent. By contrast, the share of young women earning less than $30,000 during that same period plummeted from 79.6 percent to 58.1 percent.
The Census Bureau analysis, highlighted on Monday by The Boston Globe, showed that many young men have been forced into low-wage service jobs or pushed out of the job market altogether, despite having college educations.
During the past three to four decades, the median income of young women who were working increased from $23,000 to $29,000 today, while the median income for men in the same age group plateaued or began to slip.
Indeed, between 1975 and 2016, the share of young men with incomes in the middle range of $30,000 to roughly $60,000 dropped from 49 percent to 35 percent, while their share of high-end salaries of $100,000 or more crept up from three percent to eight percent.
During that same period, the share of younger women who earned $60,000 a year or more rose from about two percent to 13 percent, a sizeable change — albeit one that still left them $11,000 lower than the average income of young men, but not necessarily because of workplace bias.
The Globe analysis blamed much of the problem for men on stagnant wages, the rising cost of living and skyrocketing student debt. While college graduates of both sexes are being forced to take lower levels jobs, men “are being hit particularly hard” and are forced to take contract or part-time work, the newspaper wrote.
Many blue-collar jobs are being lost to automation or are being shipped overseas — adding to the challenge of many millennials to find a job. At the same time, some of the fastest-growing job sectors, including health care and nursing homes, are being dominated by women.
But the Census Bureau analysis stresses that the “driving force” behind the major shift in income between young men and women has been largely the stunning rise of young women in the labor force with college degrees. Although the percentage of men in their mid-20s to mid-30s who were employed is about the same today as it was in 1975, the share of young women who were employed has risen from just under one-half to over two-thirds.
More than a third of young women today have a college degree or higher compared to less than a quarter of young women in 1975. And 57 percent of them have full-time, year-round jobs now, compared to just 46 percent in 1975.
Some experts warn that these income and employment trends among millennials could ultimately put a politically important cohort of society at a distinct economic disadvantage that could force many to delay the realization of the “American Dream,” including buying a car, getting married and buying a home.
A telling indicator of the economic problems of many millennials is the large number who are still living with their parents.
Of the 28 million young millennials aged 18 to 24, more than half — or 16 million — live in their parents’ home. That is a group of young people that is more likely to be enrolled in school and out of the labor force.
Elise Gould, a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, told The Boston Globe that “This has an effect on their entire lives,” adding, “Those first jobs are going to set you up for your lifetime of earnings.”