Tuesday, March 19, 2024
HomeWorld NewsCanada newsBuying a home? CMHC could soon kick in 10% of the cost...

Buying a home? CMHC could soon kick in 10% of the cost — for a price

The 2019 federal budget includes a tantalizing pitch for prospective first-time home buyers — one that could see Canada’s housing agency contribute up to 10 per cent of the purchase price of a home and bring down the mortgage load for borrowers.

The budget offers the program, known as the First Time Home Buyer Incentive, as a way to help with housing affordability. The government is earmarking $1.25 billion over three years for something it’s calling a “shared equity mortgage.”

Functionally, it’s more like an almost interest-free loan — one where the repayment plan doesn’t require any payback until years in the future. In order to qualify, an applicant must have a household income of less than $120,000 per year and be able to come up with a five per cent down payment — the minimum requirement for an insured mortgage with the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).

CMHC is the Crown corporation that backstops the vast majority of Canada’s housing market by insuring the loans that finance it. This new program will make its role in the market even larger than it already is.

In addition to those stipulations, the program also caps out at four times the applicant’s annual income, which means it can only help home owners looking to buy properties where the mortgage value plus the CMHC loan don’t exceed $480,000.

But if a would-be buyer meets the conditions described above, under the program the CMHC would kick in up to 10 per cent of the value of a newly built home, or five per cent of the value of a resale.

The CMHC would contribute that much to the home purchase in exchange for a corresponding equity stake in the home. That has the effect of bringing down the size of the homeowner’s mortgage — but comes with a bill to be paid down the line.

Precise details of how the program works won’t come out until later in the fall, but today the government provided a rough breakdown of how it might work for a prospective buyer. If a first-time buyer wants to buy a home that costs $400,000, they’d have to come up with a $20,000 down payment, under both the new rules and the old ones.

Normally, they’d have to take out a loan for $380,000 to cover the rest of the purchase price — but under the new program (if it’s a newly constructed home), CMHC could kick in $40,000 toward the purchase price, in exchange for a 10 per cent stake in the home.

That brings the buyer’s mortgage down to just $340,000 for the home, instead of $380,000. On a standard mortgage at 3.5 per cent interest, that translates into a monthly mortgage payment more than $200 lower than it would have been for the 25-year life of the loan. That’s more than $2,700 a year in potential savings.

The catch is that the homeowner eventually has to pay back the CMHC’s stake in the property — but they don’t have to do that until they sell (or sooner, but only if they want to).

The budget is far from clear on how much the buyer would owe; is it the same dollar amount the CMHC provided up front, or does the bill go up based on how much the house has appreciated in value?

Government officials say details of the plan will be hashed out in the coming months. Craig Alexander, chief economist with accounting consultancy Deloitte, calls the program a “clever idea” and says the benefits should outweigh the downsides.

craig

Economist Craig Alexander says the shared equity mortgage plan has the potential to help with affordability issues. (CBC)

“You want to be mindful that the government doesn’t put in policies that end up bidding up prices,” he said, adding that, on the whole, the plan could help more Canadians start climbing the housing ladder.

The government is estimating that the plan could create about 100,000 new first time buyers over the next three years.

But not everyone agrees there’s nothing but upside. Craig Wright, chief economist with the Royal Bank of Canada, calls the program “a solution looking for a problem.”

He cites research from the most recent government census in 2016: roughly 67.8 per cent of Canadians owned their own homes that year.

That’s higher than ownership rates in other countries — including the U.S., where the rate is 63.4 per cent and falling swiftly. Other world capitals such as Paris (33 per cent home ownership rate), Berlin (37 per cent) and London (47 per cent) stand in stark contrast to Canadian cities like Calgary (73 per cent) and Toronto (66 per cent).

Even rent-happy Montreal has an ownership rate of 55 per cent, which is why Wright said he’s not convinced Canada has a home ownership problem in the aggregate.

He argues the program “is more about politics than policy.” In fact, if done poorly Wright said the program has the potential to undo some of the sensible market cooling measures Ottawa has implemented in recent years: capping loan terms, setting minimum down payment levels and introducing mortgage ‘stress tests’ last year.

“Demand will show up now, while supply will show up later,” he said. “And in the near term prices could move higher so … you may make it less affordable to own a home.”

Economist David MacDonald with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives says the plan doesn’t really do much to help people buy a home more affordably.

“Taking out new loans from CMHC or retirement savings doesn’t make housing more affordable,” he said. “It just allows for another source of debt financing that must be repaid.”

The government says program details will be hashed out later but, for buyers, the repayment terms are the real wild card. Exactly how much will they have to repay CMHC? And will that sum be affected by changes in the home’s value?

“If your house goes up 20 per cent, does what you pay them go up?” Wright asks. “On the flip side, what if it goes down — do you have to make them whole?”

Wright says he suspects the CMHC will have a stake both on the upside and the down, but that’s the million-dollar question for home owners that federal officials weren’t answering today.

Other housing measures

The first-time buyers’ program wasn’t the only housing-related announcement in the budget.

The government also is increasing the amount that a first-time buyer can withdraw from an RRSP, without penalty — $35,000, up from the current level of $25,000 where it has been for the last decade. And Ottawa also will amend the RRSP withdrawal rules to help people who have been through family crises.

Starting this year, Canadians who have seen their marriages or common law partnerships break down will be able to participate in the Home Buyer’s Plan, even if they don’t meet the technical requirement of being a first-time buyer.

There’s something in the budget for renters, too.

The government says it will expand a program it launched in 2017 to fund construction of rental units with low-cost loans. Last year, it beefed up the Rental Construction Financing Initiative to add 14,000 more units to the program, and this year’s budget will add nine years of funding to the program.

For an added cost of $10 billion on to the existing program, the government says 42,500 new rental units will be added to Canada’s housing stock by 2028.

And the government also is cracking down on what it calls financial crime in the housing sector.

Recent increases to the budgets of tax and other regulatory agencies have uncovered $100 million worth of addition taxes assessed due to increasingly complicated home sales — something that has convinced the government to keep digging for more.

Ottawa will give the Canada Revenue Agency another $50 million over five years to root out tax avoidance in matters such as:

  • reporting the sale of a primary residence;
  • ensuring proper taxes are paid on the sale of a second property;
  • reporting gains from real estate ‘flipping’;
  • reporting commissions on home sales as taxable income, and;
  • builders charging and remitting GST or HST on new home sales.

The government says those crackdowns are expected to pay for themselves and then some, bringing in $68 million worth of revenue over the next half decade.

More Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!

5 Days Trending

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.