There’s something almost ritualistic about celebrity spats on social media — fans pick sides, screenshots fly around, and a small comment can swell into a headline. This time the story centers on Ruger, a rising singer, and how some of Davido’s supporters interpreted his comments about Wizkid and Wizkid’s fans. Ruger has now pushed back on the idea that he owes Davido an apology. He says plainly: he doesn’t.
Let’s start with the situation, because it’s easy to lose track. Ruger had made remarks showing admiration for Wizkid and his fanbase. That’s all. But a chunk of Davido’s followers read it differently. They suggested Ruger was taking sides — and that this choice was somehow an offense against their artist, Davido. Some of them even went so far as to claim Ruger’s career would stall unless he publicly apologized to Davido. You can imagine how a message like that lands: on one hand, it’s a demand; on the other, it’s a prediction about someone’s success. Both are a bit presumptuous.
A recent message on X (formerly Twitter) summed it up bluntly. One fan wrote that Ruger’s song wouldn’t reach number one until he “apologizes and begs Davido publicly.” That’s a dramatic claim, and it forced a public reply. Ruger didn’t do the humble-begging move — instead, he asked a simple question: did Davido ever say he had a problem with him? It’s an obvious point, but it matters. You can’t be expected to apologize for something unless the person you’re supposed to have wronged says they want an apology. Otherwise it’s just noise — other people’s anger, amplified.
Ruger has been clear in subsequent posts: he doesn’t have beef with Davido. He actually believes they’re on good terms. He went a step further and said he’d never accept the rumor that Davido “doesn’t f*ck with” him unless Davido said it publicly or told him straight to his face. That’s a reasonable boundary. If someone important to you makes a claim, say it to you — don’t rely on gossip or third-party retweets.
There’s a little human detail in Ruger’s response that I liked: he pointed out that people from Davido’s team still repost his music. That’s the kind of small, concrete evidence that contradicts dramatic claims. It doesn’t prove absolute friendship or eternal harmony, but it does complicate the simple story of a feud. It’s almost like saying, “Look, the receipts don’t match the rumor.” That line felt real — not staged, not defensive for the sake of optics, but just… noting what’s visible.
Fans sometimes forget how messy public perception is. We want clean narratives — heroes and villains, clear winners and losers — but real relationships are rarely so tidy. Artists who collaborate, who admire the same peers, who move through the same industry circles will inevitably have moments that look awkward from the outside. People online rush to fill those gaps with stories. And then, someone like Ruger has to step in and say, “No, that’s not what’s happening.” Which is honest and also a little wearying, if you ask me.
Another thing worth noting: apologies in the public eye are often treated as currency. A public apology can be a negotiation tactic — it can buy favor, save face, or be used as evidence of humility. But asking someone to apologize to a third party’s boss or camp, without that boss actually asking for an apology, is odd. It’s like telling a stranger to say sorry to someone else for a crime they didn’t commit. That’s unfair. That’s also why Ruger’s reaction makes sense: he doesn’t see a reason to offer penance when there’s no claim of wrongdoing from the alleged injured party.
Now, I’ll be honest: these situations sometimes carry a whiff of spectacle. The more people argue in public, the more attention they get, and the more the story feeds itself. Fans who are passionate — and many are, understandably — don’t always pause to check whether the people they defend even care about the fight. I’ve seen cases where careers and friendships are examined through the lens of a single tweet. It can be exhausting to watch.
Ruger’s line about believing Davido loves him too is interesting. It suggests an assumption of mutual respect, or at least a belief that any perceived issue is minor. Maybe he’s optimistic; maybe he’s giving Davido the benefit of the doubt. Either way, it’s a stance that avoids escalating things further. He also said, rather candidly, that if Davido ever said he had a problem, the reaction would spread quickly. That’s a realistically cautious note — basically, he’s saying: if the problem exists, show me the evidence.
Also read; Celebrities Who’ve Publicly Criticized Meghan Markle
I’ll add a small, personal reaction here: I’m sympathetic to Ruger’s position. If I were in his shoes, I’d be annoyed at being asked to do public humiliation for the sake of other people’s narratives. At the same time, I get why fans are protective — musicians can mean a lot to people, and fans feel invested. It’s not a simple thing. But expecting an apology when no offence has been stated? That’s an odd demand.
These episodes do have a silver lining: they remind us that public conversations often lack key voices. When rumors spread, the easiest fix is to ask the people involved for clarity, rather than making demands from the sidelines. If Davido had an issue with Ruger, sure — say it. But until then, Ruger’s answer stands: he doesn’t owe an apology, and he doesn’t accept being told he does.
Leave a comment