Thursday, March 28, 2024
HomeWorld NewsState Officials Of Both Parties Reject Requests For Voters' Identification Details

State Officials Of Both Parties Reject Requests For Voters’ Identification Details

ap 17159695097228 659f2b245608f56de9f005cc8d569d57c1dea4f1 s800 c15

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, seen earlier this month, says he is among the state officials who isn’t able to provide all the voter identification details the national commission he vice-chairs is seeking. John Hanna/AP hide caption

toggle caption

John Hanna/AP

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, seen earlier this month, says he is among the state officials who isn’t able to provide all the voter identification details the national commission he vice-chairs is seeking.

John Hanna/AP

More than a dozen states said Friday that they would not, or could not, give a White House commission looking into voter fraud detailed voter registration data as requested.

The request came in a letter Wednesday to all 50 states from Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who is vice chair of the new Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. President Trump established the commission after he alleged, without providing evidence, that as many as five million people voted illegally last November. The panel — headed by Vice President Mike Pence — has been charged with looking into voting problems and recommending ways to improve public confidence in elections.

The letter asks each state to send the panel all publicly available voter registration information by July 14, including the names, addresses, birth dates, partial Social Security numbers, party affiliation, felon status and other data for every registered voter in the country.

Several states said they would not comply because of concerns about the panel’s motives and how the information would be used.

“New York refuses to perpetuate the myth voter fraud played a role in our election,” New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said in a statement. “We will not be complying with this request and I encourage the Election Commission to work on issues of vital importance to voters, including ballot access, rather than focus on debunked theories of voter fraud.”

In an interview with NPR’s All Things Considered host Ari Shapiro, Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes said she too would not comply because of her concerns about how the data would be secured.

“I’m not going to risk sensitive information for 3.2 million Kentuckians getting in the wrong hands, into the public domain and possibly for the wrong reasons, to keep people away from the ballot box,” she told Shapiro.

Grimes and other Democrats say they worry that the commission’s findings will be used to legitimize efforts by Kobach and others to enact strict ID and other voter requirements around the country.

In response, Kobach told NPR’s Shapiro that the commission was requesting the information so that it could “understand issues of voter registration fraud. … If you don’t have the voter rolls, the commission really will have a hard time studying problems of voter registration.” Kobach said that the panel was only requesting data that “any person on the street can walk into a county election office and get. It’s not sensitive information at all,” a characterization many election officials dispute.

Kobach said the panel would like to compare the state rolls against federal Social Security Administration and citizenship databases to see if there are those on the rolls who have died or are non-citizens, and if anyone voted in their names.

“We have lots of people making claims on both sides about fraudulent voting in the name of dead people,” he said. “Well, let’s just use the federal databases and find out how big a problem it is.”

Many experts say the problem with comparing such databases is that it often leads to mismatches because of inaccuracies or differences in how names are listed. Some voting rights groups worry that it could lead to legitimate voters being purged from the rolls, even though Kobach noted that the federal panel would have no authority to do that.

In his statement announcing refusal to comply with the request, California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, a Democrat, noted that Kobach has a history of pushing tough voter requirements, which opponents say can hurt minority voters. “His role as vice chair is proof that the ultimate goal of the commission is to enact policies that will result in the disenfranchisement of American citizens,” Padilla said.

Kobach said he found such arguments “bizarre.” He acknowledged, however, that the panel does not have the authority to force states to comply with the request. “It’s simply an ask,” he told NPR.

While the strongest opposition has come from Democrats so far, several Republican secretaries of state, including Tennessee’s Tre Hargett, said they would be unable to comply because of state restrictions on sharing sensitive data. “Tennessee state law does not allow my office to release the voter information requested to the federal commission,” Hargett said in a statement.

Mississippi Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann, also a Republican, said he had yet to receive the commission’s request but that his reply to such a request would be: “They can go jump in the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi is a great State to launch from.” He cited the need to protect the privacy of state citizens “by conducting our own electoral processes.”

Ohio’s Republican Secretary of State Jon Husted also said that confidential state information would not be shared with the commission. “We do not want federal intervention in our state’s right and responsibility to conduct elections,” he added in a statement.

Wisconsin’s administrator of elections, Michael Haas, said that his state’s voter registration data is available, but for a fee of $12,500.

Even one of the Democratic members of the commission, Maine’s Democratic Secretary of State Matt Dunlap, said he was reviewing Kobach’s request to see if the state can comply. Under Maine law, recipients of state voter data are not allowed to share it or make it public, but Kobach’s letter says anything sent to the White House panel will be available to the public.

And in a bizarre twist Friday afternoon, Kobach revealed in an interview with the Kansas City Star that even he wouldn’t be providing the panel with all the information requested. He said his state will not be turning over Social Security numbers at this time. “In Kansas, the Social Security number is not publicly available,” he told the paper.

More Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!

5 Days Trending

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.