
Then came the episode that derailed her run at NBC. During a roundtable discussion, she made comments about blackface that she later described as an attempt to contextualize how certain Halloween costumes had been viewed in the past. The reaction was swift and fierce. I don’t need to rehearse the exact wording here — you’ve seen it — but the fallout was immediate. NBC canceled her show days later, and she left with her contract settled but her reputation bruised.
There are two layers to that moment. One: it showed how quickly a single comment in a live format can collapse a career era. Two: it revealed how brittle the transition from cable to mainstream daytime could be. Her exit felt theatrical, yes, but also real — a reminder that public figures navigate a narrow path, where private intentions and public interpretations rarely line up.
Also read: Ryan Seacrest’s Look Has People Talking — And Some Are Worried
Rebuilding, differently
What I found surprising — maybe because I’d assumed the story would end there — was how Kelly responded. Instead of disappearing, she began to build in new directions. She launched an independent media company, Devil May Care Media, and started a podcast, The Megyn Kelly Show, in September 2020. There’s something refreshingly practical about that: when the old doors close, you build your own. It’s not glamorous, but it’s effective, and it gives someone control they hadn’t had in years.
Kelly has been candid about how that moment of reinvention arrived. She’s said she spent a lot of 2019 and early 2020 on her couch, watching the world and feeling stuck. Then she got a call — reportedly from Ben Shapiro — pointing out that there was a lane for her outside mainstream outlets. That’s an odd little detail, but it matters. It shows that fallow periods can gestate new ideas. I can relate to that: periods of quiet often feel useless until, suddenly, you realize they were the setup for the next move.
A new platform, a familiar voice
From podcasting, she moved on to radio. In mid-2021 she signed with SiriusXM for a radio show — steady, live time where her voice and opinions could matter again. And later, she reportedly secured her own channel on SiriusXM. Now, I don’t want to act as if this was a seamless climb back to the top. It wasn’t. But it was a deliberate pivot toward spaces where the rules are looser and the audience can be more direct. Kelly’s line about “linear television news is dead” captures the point she’s making: people are tired of overly scripted TV and want unfiltered conversation — or at least that’s the pitch.
There’s a bit of boldness there, and also a hint of contradiction. Kelly’s career was built in large part by very precise, polished TV work. Yet now she’s arguing for a rawer, less censored form. Maybe that’s the point: she’s choosing formats where she can be less managed and more herself. Or maybe it’s also convenient rhetoric that fits what she’s building. I’m not sure, and that uncertainty feels right. People evolve, sometimes messily.
Where things stand now
So where does that leave Kelly? Pretty far from the Fox microphone, that’s clear. She’s no longer the cable star who could dominate a nightly lineup; instead she’s an entrepreneur of a sort — producing, hosting, and curating content on platforms she helps control. She’s had big setbacks and some notable wins. She’s been canceled and then found avenues that embraced her candid, sometimes controversial style.
If you squint, you can see a pattern: a rise through a traditional route, a very public fall, and then a move toward independence. That’s a path a lot of media figures have taken — but Kelly’s version comes with a particular intensity because of the scale of her Fox success and the speed of her NBC exit. It’s also a reminder that careers in the spotlight rarely end cleanly. They veer, they loop, and sometimes they double back. Kelly’s story is still in motion, and there are elements that feel unresolved. She’s rebuilt, yes, but she’s also rebranded in ways that raise new questions about audience, tone, and long-term influence.
Also read: An Awkward Joke at the Orchard and What It Says About William and Kate
Final thoughts
I don’t have a tidy verdict on whether Kelly “won” or “lost.” It’s less a single outcome and more an ongoing experiment. She traded institutional security for independence, and that trade-off has costs and gains. Ultimately, she’s remade herself to fit the media landscape she thinks will thrive: live, less scripted, directly monetized. That’s a plausible bet. Time will tell if it pays off, or if another misstep — or simply changing tastes — pushes her into yet another reinvention.